From Abstract to Concrete: Decision Making, Cultural Understanding, and the Global Partners Program
Teaching decision analysis helps countries improve national processes, yet successful application requires managing cultural differences. To help ensure student success, the Global Partners in Education’s Global Understanding courses improve the ability of students to manage varying cultural contexts, encouraging cross-fertilization of ideas. Having said that, how does the GPE alter instruction in cross-cultural understanding and in decision-making to provide this success? To answer this question, I evaluate concepts of three areas of instruction: decision analysis, cross-cultural analysis, and the GPE. First, how does each of the three approach their subject? Second, what insights do they provide about each other? Finally, how does interaction among the three areas affect student performance? Combining decision and cultural models with the Global Understanding approach allows students to address these issues both directly and indirectly, ensuring ecological validity, that is, ensuring that they provide ‘real world’ insights. As with any models, repeated application of core principles allows students to move from the abstract to the concrete more readily. The Global Understanding approach addresses this challenge by repeatedly taking students in and out of their experiential and substantive backgrounds, making contact with the rich complexity of human understanding more routine.
The Global Partners in Education Journal (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
1. Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
2. Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
• The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
• The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
• The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
• The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
• The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
• The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Curriculum and Instruction.
3. The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.