English Language Curriculum in Macedonia

Authors

  • Bisera Dalcheska-Taleska University American College, Skopje, North Macedonia
  • Marjana Vaneva University American College, Skopje, North Macedonia

Abstract

In order to highlight the need for change in the instructional practices and English language curricula in Macedonia, this paper targets the first-grade curriculum in the country and the lesson plans adhering to the planning standards developed by the Bureau for Development of Education. The study employs a mixed-methods approach to conduct research in a village in Macedonia. Qualitative data have been gathered from an online semi-structured interview with two educators from the United States of America, Cuchiarra and Fillmore, who have conducted extensive research in urban districts throughout the country. Another source for qualitative data is the comments on the reflection checklists that have been developed and filled out by the author of the study. Then, the author randomly chose 32 students from the same grade-level, divided them into two focus groups that had students with different proficiency levels and implemented two curricula; the one developed by the Bureau with group A, and another one based on the 3Ls Framework, which is a framework developed by the interviewees, with group B. In order to gather quantitative data, four posttests were administered, and the results are subject to analysis and comparison. Two hypotheses are tested, null – which refers to having no difference in the posttest results, and alternative – with regards to a possible difference in the posttest results. When it comes to the design, this is a QUAL -> quan design, i.e., more data is coming from the core qualitative component due to the limitation of the quantitative data. The core component is the qualitative data that can stand on its own, yet the quantitative data is regarded as a supplemental component and does not stand on its own. However, both outcomes of the research process will lead to integration in the conclusion because both types of data are in constant interaction. The findings of the study show that the current English language curriculum in Macedonia does not prepare the students for lifelong learning nor life in the 21st century, does not nurture a culture for independent learning, nor requires critical thinking or meaningful discussions.

Key words: curriculum, research, outcomes, data

Author Biographies

Bisera Dalcheska-Taleska, University American College, Skopje, North Macedonia

Bisera Dalcheska-Taleska has been an English language teacher since 2016. She received her Bachelor’s degree in English Language and Literature from Blaze Koneski Faculty of Philology in 2016 and is currently enrolled in a Master’s program in English Language Teaching at University of American College Skopje, as well as a Master’s program in Linguistics at Blaze Koneski Faculty of Philology. She has been a Guilford County Schools employee for two years, teaching English as a Second Language in Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

Marjana Vaneva, University American College, Skopje, North Macedonia

Marjana Vaneva, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Linguistics and English and a Dean of the School of Foreign Languages at the University American College Skopje. She is a certified teacher of English, with an MA degree in Linguistics, with the thesis title: “Means of Expressing Negation in English and Macedonianˮ and a PhD degree also in Linguistics, with the thesis title: “Zero Derivation in English and Macedonianˮ, all obtained from the English Department of the Faculty of Philology “Blaze Koneskiˮ, Skopje at the SS Cyril and Methodius University.

Published

2022-12-13

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Proceedings of the 7th Global Issues Conference

Section

Global Issues Conference Proceedings

The Global Partners in Education Journal (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:

1. Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.

2. Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    • The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    • The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    • The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    • The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    • The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    • The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Curriculum and Instruction.

3. The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.