The Great Drug Regulation Divide: How Resource Imbalance Is Strangling Global Health Equity
Abstract
This study investigates the global disparity in the allocation of pharmaceutical regulatory resources, focusing on the significant gap between high-income and low-income countries in terms of regulatory capacity, drug quality, safety, and accessibility. It highlights how differences in resources directly impact the ability of low-income countries to ensure the safety and availability of medicines, with high-income countries benefiting from more robust regulatory systems. The research utilizes a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis of regulatory budgets and staffing levels, alongside qualitative case studies of countries with data gaps, such as Haiti and Papua New Guinea. The study also includes a detailed case analysis of China—the world's second-largest pharmaceutical market—to explore how regulatory capacity differences manifest within a large, middle-to-high-income economy. The findings reveal that the regulatory divide not only constitutes a technical challenge but also represents a fundamental issue of global health equity and public health security. To address this divide, the study proposes solutions including strengthening international cooperation, enhancing regulatory capacity in low-income countries, and implementing digital tools to improve regulatory efficiency. The study concludes with policy recommendations and identifies future research avenues, emphasizing the need for standardized data collection, cross-country comparisons, and the development of regulatory frameworks that suit the unique needs of different countries.
Keywords: drug regulation, China, country income levels, pharmaceutical industry
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Global Partners in Education Journal (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
1. Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
2. Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
• The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
• The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
• The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
• The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
• The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
• The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Curriculum and Instruction.
3. The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.
